Watch LIVE Impeachment Trial of President Donald Trump day four: ABC News Live Coverage

  • 🎬 Video
  • ℹ️ Description
Watch LIVE Impeachment Trial of President Donald Trump day four: ABC News Live Coverage 3.5
UCBi2mrWuNuyYy4gbM6fU18Q

#ImpeachmentTrial #TrumpImpeachment #SenateImpeachmentTrial #ABCNews

LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER:
GOOD MORNING AMERICA'S HOMEPAGE:

💬 Comments on the video
Author

Who the heck Actually watch the whole thing with no skips??

Author — J O R D Y HeRnAnDeZ

Author

I am surprised that so many people feel that it is more important to "win", than to keep crooks out of government power.

Author — tim loosemore

Author

Ahhh finally a cure for my insomnia. don't know why they posted 11hours of this, i was nodding off after 12 minutes...

Author — Chris Yu

Author

soooo. is he impeached is what i wanna know. this shii is rediculous.

Author — DRIP SQUAD

Author

Is this repeating or do I just remember it from the congressional investigating committee.?
There is new audio of Trump saying " get rid of her, get rid of her, take her out."It's from 2018. Parnas and Hyde heard him say this stuff to no one in particular. We have also seen emails from Hyde to Parnas and someone in Belgium threatening Marie Yovanovitch, followed by an urgent call to get her out of the country that very night!!!
There is no doubt, Trump is consolidating a criminal, corrupt tyrannical goverment. Next you will see military parades, an extended term, and a presidential palace. You will also see a purge of the administration, especially to root out the whistleblower. Who he says he would like to kill.
I think the tone should be graver concerning his offences. The gentle tones are not always congruent with the gravity or portent of his threats and unhinged behaviour.
Chilling.

Author — canuck

Author

This might be an interesting election year...

Author — Danny Sullivan Music

Author

when you made it to the other side.. did you talk about native americans?

Author — Devin Cockroft

Author

I see she still hasn't bothered to brush her hair for this trial

Author — Ginger Firestone

Author

The CLOWN SHOW is getting OLD... time for the Senate to SHUT IT DOWN

Author — Tom Campbell

Author

haven't they used up their 24 hours yet?

Author — Ginger Firestone

Author

I love how democrats use news articles in place of actual evidence. Because we all know that in a court of law a news article gives a much higher chance of a guilty verdit than actual testimony and witness. There may have been witness but none of them had any actual evidence but had plenty of opinions. And we all know that opinions are even stronger than news articles and actual facts.

Author — Chris Marino

Author

Majority Rules or Majority Fools?

In terms of rationality, let us of reasonable conscious, intellect, and ability, motivated by unbiased truth finding, judge by logic and reason, whether the facts as submitted amount to an impeachable offense at stage one:

Interesting to the fact is that impeachment is not an offense at all rather a proceeding that must be initiated by the U.S. House of Representatives requiring: 1.) written charges of the alleged misconduct, 2.) at least two-thirds of Congress’ vote, and for the charges to be sustained they must apparently meet a non-standardized test of 3.) “seriousness”. If not, the Senate can elect to acquit the offending federal official such as the President. Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 744, 102 S.Ct. 2690, 73 L.Ed. 2d 349 (1982); Palmer, K. (2000). Constitutional Amendments 1789 to Present. Michigan: Gale Group. (pp. 83, 149, 450, 457, 459-464, 559-564)

Based upon the stipulated and drafted written charges of the House of Representatives of “Abuse of Power” and “Obstruction of Justice” it should be little dispute that the U.S. House of Representatives have met step 1.

The next step, which is combined into step 3, asks whether these charges should be sustained by at least two-thirds of Congress’ vote which meets “a non-standardized test of seriousness”.

Hence, according to the above standard, there facially appears to be no proof of evidence that is even required at all rather just the written charges submitted by the U.S. House of Representatives and a finding of “seriousness” by “at least two-thirds of Congress’ vote” is all that is mandated to justify the proceedings of “impeachment”.

American People, is this, in your rational opinion, a heavy burden of proof?

The next step, therefore, asks whether the charges as alleged are “serious” since it can be no dispute step one is met.

After hearing the circular and often contradicting arguments of the defense above, that for the most part was guided by an ad hominem fallacy engaged in attacking certain characters of the House Representative(s) implying improper motives, it can be no rational dispute the defense has failed to negate the written charges of “Obstruction of Justice” and “Abuse of Power”, nor can they as they are simple written charges drafted and prepared (as required).

Further, finding the defense failed to spearhead the issue of “seriousness”, it can be no dispute the House’s arguments are very daunting and imposing upon the American people as a whole and, therefore, no doubt serious. The defense is critically flawed and unavailing as they do not address the proper standard of review.

Should we fail to engage ourselves into this matter and judge the matter fairly, it shows the world that we do not rely upon facts. It shows the world we do not rely upon rationale. It shows the world we do not even respect our own laws.

It shows the world we do not take our own democracy serious. In sum, it shows us vulnerable and easily misled. And for that, combined with both political parties beseeching of the People’s judgment in this regard, a poll of the U.S. vote on this matter finding the written charges are "serious" is warranted and imminent, though not necessarily required to sustain the action of impeachment.

Author — On The Move Network

Author

Pembunuh harus di hukum...keadilan di mn...? Ke jahatan yg di lakukan presiden donal trum atas pembunuhan berencana...pembunuh harus di hukum tegak kan hukum keadilan ada di mn,

Author — Muhamad Kahfi

Author

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟GOOD JOB!! THE WORLD NOW KNOWS THAT TRUMP IS GUILTY! ANYONE WHO IGNORES THE TRUTH IS A TRAITOR THEMSELVES!!

Author — Annie Warbux

Author

If there's nothing to hide let the speakers speak let the documents come out something is being hidden and it's the truth..

Author — India Anderson

Author

🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯TRUMP HAS NO DEFENSE!! HIS OWN OBSTRUCTION OF CONGRESS WILL NOT SAVE HIM! THERE IS MORE THAN ENOUGH EVIDENCE!!

Author — Annie Warbux

Author

A trial without witnesses? Wtf is going on in the us? I‘m from Austria and our Definition of a fair Trial is WITH witnesses😂

Author — aaron.for.friends

Author

Convoluted illogical repub arguments, straw man diatribes, lies, that's all they have because this is a cult mentality. They left their intellect at the polling station.

Author — canuck

Author

I just watched Trump's Attorneys in their opening statement. They did such a poor job, they just opened up the need for Documentary Evidence, and Witnesses.. and that tape that came out last night on Ambassador Yovanovitch was damning. It all fits the Narrative provided by the House Managers. But the funniest thing is that Fox News thinks it was Brilliant... "The fruit doesn't fall far from the Tree" LOL

Author — Alex

Author

Wow now there russian prosecutors who are trying to smear hunter hahshshshshashahah this man is shitting bricks !!!!

Author — C J