Raffay Ernő előadása Trianonról

  • 🎬 Video
  • ℹ️ Description
Raffay Ernő előadása Trianonról 4.5
UCl0vWvWsD-qFzQkx-Bj5pPw



💬 Comments on the video
Author

A történelemnek nincs vége. Volt, amikor Magyarországot csak a Felvidék jelentette. Egyszer majd fordul a kocka és visszatérnek az elcsatolt részek.

Author — Robi Redford

Author

1:37:04 2020 -ban 616 milliárd lett a honvédelmi költségvetés és nem 1000 milliárd. Kell a pénz focira.

Author — Nagy Attila

Author

Ejnye-bejnye Raffay Úr! Ha Izrael ellenségeit nem fegyverzik fel, akkor hogy fog beteljesedni a bibliai háború?
Tetszik ezt érteni?

Author — Atila Nimrod

Author

A történésznek pártatlannak illene lenni.Jól tudja mindenki, hogy a dualizmus korában a népek 6% a szavazott.Ha rendes választásokat megengedtek volna korábban, akkor már korábban kiderült volna, hogy a király meztelen.Trianonnál derült ki.

Author — RadnaiFerenc

Author

A kék kockás ingű fiatalember mindig eltakarja az arcát. Miért ?

Author — Tibor Magyari

Author

Történelmi igazság feltárása mindenkor kötelező ! Ismerje meg minden magyar diák, tanítsák az ifjúságnak!

Author — Imréné Juhász

Author

a motskosch torpe megutte magat akkor ?XD suvadt e meg vagy meg el a patkan?

Author — Dracones Scythicus

Author

Végre egyre többen vannak, akik ki tudják mondani azt amit az agymosó "égi csatornák" nem mondanak, eltitkolnak.

Author — László Enzsöl

Author

A szamadaoka minden MAGYAR tudja, sajnos ezek az eöadasok csak Vilamharitok. De lassan nem lesz mar akikbe belecsap....A mai fiatal azt Sem tudja hogy Fastfood, vagy fogamzasgatlo...SAJNA!!!!

Author — janos enekes

Author

Bikini - A szabadság rabszolgái - YouTuó

Author — Margit Rácz

Author

Sylvia Terzian !
Explain in English !
There’s no age limit on stupidity ! The Romanians attempts to provide historical background but
the history seems to come from a Romanian textbooks of the Mihai Eminescu 1974 the Communist
Authorities. As a Nationalist Historian PASCU had a duty to show Romanian glorious FUTURE!
Romanian must wonder about the validity of any Romanian HISTORY !

Have a nice Day !

Author — Sigmond Nagy

Author

egy megoldas van trianonnal kapcsolatban fel kell vasarolni erdelyt mint a zsidok csinaljak magyarorszaggal

Author — albert balazs

Author

A Habsburg birodalom szétesett, vele mi is...ilyen a történelem, sajnos a lakosság mindig az áldozat (nagyon laikus megfogalmazásban).

Author — Károly Varga

Author

VESSZEN TRIANON VISSZA MAGYAR FOLDEK

Author — Marton Steve

Author

" Let me explain it in plain English...The Romanians of today are the ROMAN WALLACIANS and implicitly THE VOLSCI (Chaser's and Cicero's people - If I look on the Internet things changed on "Wikipedia" since we mentioned the symbolism where there is no more INDICATION of Cesar and Cicero ANY MORE as being the Volsci (As it was before) and I wonder why (the money talk and the bulshit wolks?), those people (Roman Wallacians aka Volsci) who lived in Rome as an independent nation (As described by a Thracian - Getian by the name of Strabo and who later on were moved (The Volsci = Independent nation within Rome) by Emperor Diocletian to the areas of the Balkans (South of Danube) as Byzantine Emperor Constantine P. (Xth cent AD) describe it very intensely. His (Emperor Constantine P. ) description of the origin of the Wallacians is collaborated by the "The annals of Jan Dlugosz" (XVth cent AD) - a totally independent source than the Byzantine Emperor Constantine P. Also adding here are some Popes from Rome, Byzantine Emperor (Constantin P. - who we mentioned before, abruptly), Byzantine officials and all the educated class of the middle ages (BEFORE MIDDLE AGES = when the West was in the DARK AGES) of the so called Europe. Remember that at that time only some 10 % of the people of Europe were EDUCATED and those were the KINGS, CHURCH OFFICIALS and LORDS...who all were Romans and THRACIANS and they were from SOUTH EASTE of EUROPE.
NOT GERMAN, SLAVS OR OTHERS.
In his Book, Jan Dlugosz ( who study at the University in Paris) describes the Wallachians to be the Romans from Rome, more exactly the Volsci themselves. Also, Popes (from Rome - Remember that the word for PRIEST in Romanian is POPE), Byzantine Emperors and their officials and all the educated class of Europe described the Wallacians to be nothing else but the Romans themselves. (The descriptions of the Germans is totally different about the Wallachians...the description made by the BARBARIANS of the north = Blondes whose Kings and so called Emperors were Roman Wallacians)
That's why we have THE NAME "Cesar" as a MONARCH all over EASTERN EUROPE (Inclusive Germany) in different forms . Only because the Volsci were/are The Wallacians aka Romanians and as a result since Cesar was a Volscian the Royal Name was kept alive.
Germany = Kaiser = Cesar (remember that part of the world who called themselves 'Holy Roman Empire)
Russia, Bulgaria = Tsar = Cesar (That part of the world where it is known that the Roman Wallacians were the Kings aka Tzars of the Slavs)
As I mentioned in my previous postings all (all of them not just Tsar Ionitza in latin = Caloiohannes ) the Kings and Lords of Bulgaria were Roman Wallacians (sustained by many credible manuscripts which I mentioned very intensely beforehand). The name of Cesar (Tsar) of the Bulgarians was accepted and embraced by the Byzantine Emperors although they were enemies from time to time.
All the Tsars/Lords of Russia were also known by the Muslims (their written accounts of Xth cent.AD) as Romans (that's how they- the Lords of the "Russians" identified themselves (Xth cent) - not to be the Slavs and other nordics who constituted the lower class and many of them slaves).
And all the Kaisers of Germany were Roman Wallacians, not Saxons as it is suggested by contemporary historians. The Saxons were brought initially by the Wallacian Emperors of Bulgaria to work the mines (salt and coal), kind of in the same time with the Hungarian Kings (who were all Wallachians) who also brought hard working people to work the mines north of Danube.
Remember that the Prussians were not Germans at all (They were Thracians) but they were Germanized. Most likely exactly the same thing happened with the Avars (Bavaria?), Dacians (Dutch in German)?, etc...
who migrated north, west and east to escape the Romans

Ancient Russia by George Vernadsky

"It is probable that the Rus took advantage of the Kagan's defeat, and we
may even tentatively refer to this date (825) the emancipation of the
Russian Kagnate from the Khazars. We may note that Muqaddasi adds to his
statement on the kagan's conversion the following line:
'I have likewise heard that Roman warriors, known as Rus, conquered the
Khazars and seized their land.'

Note: The Rus are described as Roman warriors
Hint: The Roman warriors were the Kings, Lords and Military Leaders of some of these people ...NORDICS...or of many of them...
"Groups of Saxon ore miners (called саси, sasi in Bulgarian) are known to have settled in the ore-rich regions of Southeastern Europe. In the 13th-14th century, Germans from the Upper Harz and Westphalia[3] settled in and around Chiprovtsi in modern northwestern Bulgaria (then part of the Second Bulgarian Empire) to extract ore in the western Balkan Mountains, receiving royal privileges from Bulgarian tsar Ivan Shishman.[4]"

Note that NO SAXONS WERE ALLOWED to be KINGS, LORDS of the Bulgarian and Hungarian Kingdoms. (since they were PEASANTS with no Imperial roots).I mentioned that just in case...
THE WALLACIAN KINGS OF HUNGARY GERMANY RUSSIA AND OF ALL THE BARBARIANS OF EUROPE WERE UNDER THE ROMAN WALLACIAN SPELL

Same thing with the Hungarians, Germans and all the Slavs of Eastern Europe inclusive Russia and Ukraine).The Roman Wallacians were all their Kings, Lords and Church officials, not just Ioannes Corvinus and his family.
Based on the " Itinerary of Benjamin of Tudela" = Travel in the middle ages (XII cent AD), a Jewish writer ...the Wallacians give themselves Jewish names... :
" The nation called Wallachians live in those mountains . They are as swift as hinds, and they sweep down from that mountains to despoil and ravage the land of Greece (Byzantium).
No man can go up and do battle against them, and no king can rule over them. They do not hold fast to the faith of the Nazarenes, but give themselves Jewish names. Some people say that they are Jews and, in fact, they call Jews their brethren, and ... "
Very important is to notice the fact that Benjamin of Tudela did not find any Jews in Byzantium and all the area of the Balkans inclusive Hungary. The only "Jews" he found in those places were the Wallacian Romans who embraced Judaism in a partial manner at that time and before.(Remember the Khazars - Remember also that some Bulgarians (Volga Bulgarians) were totally involved in a different religion). You know what I mean
The names of few Hungarian kings are:
Samuel - 1041
Solomon - 1063
Here we can add the Hungarian Chronicles where it is described the relationship between the Roman Wallacians and Hungarians (tribes of different ethnicity). This Chronicle describes intensely (some times politically) the symbioses between the Hungarians and Wallacians. That's how the Kings (all of them) of Hungary became WALLACIANS (some say that those initial Lords of Hungary were already Wallachians or a combination with the Thracians.)
Same with Poland where the earliest Polish LEGENDS are describing the first Kings of Poland to be Romans.
History of Europe is politizasied to the extreme.
You will always have to investigate...always but always
Note: These Roman Wallacians are like the story of Cinderella...Isn't it?
Note II : Curious is the fact that all the so called Historians of the Communist era "the Illuminati of the Ceausescu's Bolshevism " and implicitly the USSR- one of them was his wife who despite the fact that she did not have more than a Gimnazium under her wings ( with the lowest possible grades) she became a Doctor in CHEMISTRY (Recognized "INTERNATIONALLY" - as the Bolsheviks said it and in the present acknowledge/ed by some, tacitly - Romanian "Academics" of Bolsevic extract). Her husband, Ceausescu, from a shoemaker became a General and later on a Prezident - He himself didn't have more than a Gimnazium school and probably stretched his :academic" life by some of his disciples (all Communists)
Do we need school? NIET.
Same with the Historians of Romania of today, Ioan Aurel Pop (known to work for the SECURITATE and transferred to New York (as DIRECTOR OF NEW YORK LIBRARY ATTACHED TO THE ROMANIAN CONSULATE IN NEW YORK to spy on Romanian Americans or American Romanians or Americans), Giurescu - SENIOR and JUNIOR (known to visit Hungary very regularly and stayed in USA for a wile - he is also known to work for the SECURITATE), Lucian Boia (known to be sponsored by THE Hungarians to the extreme)...Napoleon Savescu (Dentists or so, who became an instant (like Instant Coffee) Historian as many others from the Communist era . affiliated to all Generals and all COMMUNISTS in the same Romania) - He comes with the idea that the Dacians were conquered only 23, 6% by the idiot, uneducated Romans - he is connected mainly with the old SECURITATEA...that's a long list a very long list of those mentioned above...

That's what happen when the Communist know it all and the others should shut up and The Germans Austrians and Hungary and somehow (under the table) the Russians takes advantage of HISTORY ITSELF or of the Romanian History. (THOSE PEOPLE WHO CREATED THEM ALL, FROM NORTH TO SOUTH, FROM EAST TO WEST).
"

Author — Sylvia Terzian

Author

meg kell nézni, hol tart a katonai költségvetés?

Author — József Károly Nagy

Author

" To summarize what I've said, "antes"... in a Ciceronian (Marcus Tullius Cicero) style:
Romanians, aka Volsci (OCS - Old Church Slavonic = Volos, and old German WALH = ROMAN)
In the so called Gothic language, "VOLK" = ARMED PEOPLE aka Roman Wallacians, those who civilized Europe. (My educated impresion and others without a political expression or exposure).
Remember that Cesar and Cicero were Volscians. Also, "Camilla in Virgil's Aeneid, a Volscian Warrior Maiden (like the legendary Amazons). Virgil says that she could run over the waves of the sea without getting her feet wet (probably like Jesus Crist?) She fights on the side of the Latins and kills many of the Trojan refugees before being killed herself by the Etruscan hero Arruns".) = taken from Wikipedia.(some hate this source for obvious reasons).
The reality about the so called Wikipedia is that ANYBODY CAN PUT AN INPUT WITH FOLSE OR ARRANGED INTENTIONS. PROBABLY THAT'S WHY IT WAS DESIGNED BY THE ENGLISH?
Who knows...
Now is the time for (so called) Europe to civilize the Romanians (Not necessarily the Germans, Austrians, Hungarians and the Russian or those who are the initiators of the bogus history of Romania - here the communists of Romania played an implicit role)...taking in consideration the well known political facts associated with the contemporary Romania and implicitly with the Communists who are still very - very (EXTREMELY) active and kicking, protecting all the Communist Historians who were/are still employed in some ways by those who worked for SECURITATE (Remember that the Securitate of yesterday are the Politicians of today) . Today they present themselves under different names but with the same Soviet agenda, slightly changed. Like the GERMANS in the past...but with HEAVY SUPERVISION FROM USA, ENGLAND...NATO?...otherwise they (Germans) would continue the same LINE as before.
And those politicians (mentioned above) politicized ( By the way "POLITICIZE" in this case = REARRANGE IT OR FABRICATE IT = THEY DO THAT ALL THE TIME AND WE HAPPY - depends who "We" are) the history of Romania to the point that regular people don't know what to believe.(that is in Romania - imagine what the others do - GERMANS, HUNGARIANS, RUSSIANS = VERY INTENSELY AND EXTREMELY DISTORTIVE AND IN THE SAME TIME SENSIBLY SECRETIVE).
Interesting ...isn't it ?
Note I : I didn't see any academically (not intensely or partially or vaguely politizaised) written books or debates about the influence of POLITICS (Nazis, Communists, Extreme or hidden nationalists(plenty of those around there...in Europe and USA) with a solid complex of inferiority being the last one, I believe, reluctantly but solidly somehow that it will go as it is ) and CHURCH (Orthodox (Partially RUSSIA with its Third Rome Believe which can be activated/believed as the case of Germany (The so called " HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE" only taking in consideration the KINGS and LORDS who were Romans - but NOT THE GERMANS THEMSELVES (Populous) or RUSSIANS THEMSELVES (populous) in case of Russia= third Rome = how they are equating themselves, somehow discreetly), HUNGARIANS (Were Vatican is a BIG PLAYER and others were/are behind), Protestants (Where Germans and others are a BIG PLAYER), etc) in TODAY'S European History.
Note II : There is no way in the world that some barbarians (Germans or the so called CELTS, SCLAVINI (SLAVS) CIVILIZED EUROPE AS DESCRIBED BY THE SO CALLED CONTEMPORARY "INITIATORS"=BARBARIANS OF EUROPE OR ATTRACTING THAT IDEA) as an entity would accept the language of the Romans (ROMAN EMPIRE), (State and Church acceptance only - the peasants spoke their own language = Just as it was in the time of Herodotus who explained that there were Royal Rulers (a minority) and a huge expanse of land occupied by a MASSIVE NUMBER OF BARBARIANS (referring manly to the Scythians masses (BARBARIANS) and Schitian LORDS who according to Strabo were mixed with the Thracians )
just because it was kool do do so. The Kings and Lords and a part of the military of those so called countries were Roman Wallachians and Thracians. Remember that (as I mentioned before - previous postings) the tribe of the Rus (Vikings) were described by an Arab writer (X th cent AD) as Romans, referring of course to their (Viking) leaders.
Note: I was wondering if these Romans and Thracians didn't think of themselves as the CONQUERORS OF EUROPE AND IMPLICITLY THE TROJANS (ROMANS) AND THRACIANS...AS BEFORE ...
Also remember that the Prussians, described by the Polish Chronicler Dugloz (I don't recall the exact spelling of his name) as Thracian Bythinians ( had their capital at Romowe (I don't recall also the exact spelling right now). One of the Lithuanian Chronicler describes the Kings and Lords of Lithuania to be Romans.
Poland (as I described in another post) was ruled by the Romans.
READ IT SO YOU LEARN.
Ruthenians (A combination of Slavs, Celts, Germans and others) also ruled by Roman Wallacians.
Also remember that the Ottoman Turks refer to the Wallacians as " Those people who call themselves Romans"...Just in case...
Furthermore, all the Kings and Lords and Church officials and part of the military establishment of all the Slavs AND GERMANS AND HUNGARIANS AND BULGARIANS AND ALL OTHERS OF EUROPE INCLUSIVE TURKEY AND OTHERS WERE Roman Wallacians (Starting with the first king of the Slavs...Samo, French, English, Spanish Kings and Lords) aka Volsci/Volos/Olah/Vlach/Wallacian, etc (Can be proven academically).
Moreover, I mentioned in another post on this site that the Kings and Lords and Church Officials of Hungary were all Romanians (Roman WALLACIANS) not just the family of Matthias Corvinus.
Additionally, all the Emperors of Bulgaria were all Roman Wallacian as I also proved it (partially - there are a lot more to this story)before on this site.
Francis Dvornik (Chomýž, 14 August 1893 – Chomýž, 4 November 1975), in Czech František Dvorník, was a priest and academic, and one of the leading twentieth-century experts on Slavic and Byzantine history, and on relations between the churches of Rome and Constantinople.

“ The new Bulgarian rulers were the first to solicit the support of Rome.
A letter addressed in 1199 by Pope Innocent III to the noble man Joannica, who ruled in Bulgaria after the assassination of Asen and Peter, shows that a request of this sort must have been made to Rome by the addressee,
Who was also called Kalojan (John the Fair), (1197-1207), or by his brothers. Incidentally this letter, in which the Pope says that Joannica’s ancestors were of Roman origin, or rather the latter’s reaction to this allusion, provides further evidence that the Bulgarian rulers were Vlachs (Romanians) and not Bulgarians”
Interesting isn't it?
It will get more refined and implicitly academically acceptable (BY ALL OF YOU_), soon.
And that tells us volumes about the present (Contemporary) day Europe and it's fabricated History.
At least in my educated view (or uneducated, depending on the reader = belief and understanding = in many cases BRAINWASHED)
Politically/Historically speaking, the Germans, Austrians and the Russians are controlling Eastern Europe with the help of Hungarians, in any ways, inclusive HISTORY as I mentioned previously in a very vivid way..
NOTE:
Read : "Relatii Romano-Bulgarere dea lungul veacurilor" (Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste Romania - NESEMNAT DE NIMENI) cu comitet de redactie:
Comitetul Roman: M. BERZA
VL. DISULESCU
ST. STEFANESCU
Comitetul BULGAR:
D. ANGELOV
V.PASKALEVA
N.TODOROV
CALLED BULGARIANS.
Here, in this book, the Russians and Bulgarians (accompanied closely by some Romanian Historians = Communists) are suggesting "ACADEMICALLY" that, wherever you see written "Vlacks" (in Byzantine History Books written by Byzantines), it should be translated as "BULGARIANS".
Something that the west of the so called Europe ignore it to the bone since they themselves are doing the same. And I guess all Europe does it, INTENTIONALLY...that is the GERMANS, SLAVS, GREEKS, ENGLAND WITH ITS NORDIC ASSOCIATES EUROPE.
I wonder WHY?
GIURESCU AND "FAMIGLIA" (A WELL KNOWN SOVIET AND IMPLICITLY A ROMANIAN "SECURITATE"... HISTORIAN)
AUREL POP = WELL KNOWN "SECURITATE" HISTORIAN AND SPY (He has books in NYPL = New York Public Library where Ceausescu appear on the first page)
Lucian Boia = A Historian commanded (sponsored) by the Hungarians who has the same ideas as ISTVAN VASARY, a Hungarian Linguist AKA HISTORIAN
Istvan Vasary a Hungarian Linguist/Historian in his book
"Cumans and Tatars" is describing the VLACHS (ROMAN WALLACIANS) as a
nation lost around who were basically BARBARIANS and SHEEPHERDERS with no sense
of a nation or identity, living in the mountains as SHEPHERDS.
He goes further to analyze (Hungarian style = DIAGONALLY) the names of the ROMAN WALLACIANS, starting
with those Slavic names of the VLACHS (First Lords known of the WALLACIAN
ROMANS IN TRANSYLVANIA) : LITOVOI, SENESLAU (SLAVIC NAMES)
Note: The names of the KINGS, LORDS does not necessarily
imply that they were of a certain origin. (Read JORDANS how the ROMANS CHANGED THEIR NAMES)
Furthermore, he goes diagonally sustaining( LINGUISTICALLY BASED
AGAIN) that the first rulers of WALLACIA WERE CUMMANS since he find the name
BASARAB there and this according to him must be Turkic/Cuman.
Note: "Basarab" = it is a corruption of the
"SERB, SEARB...etc" that means coming from the region of SERBIA.
Stephan the Great of Moldavia is known to come from the same region, that is
SERBIA since he was related to the Kings of that area (THE WALLACIAN KINGS OF
THE SLAVS).
PS THE LORDS OF HUNGARY, TURKEY, CUMANS and PECHENEGS WERE ALL ROMAN WALLACIANS

Author — Sylvia Terzian

Author

Talán a székelyeket kell megkérdezni...Csak nekik van joga dönkeni!

Author — József Károly Nagy

Author

Trianon "örök téma" ? Tehát - Dr R.E. szerint - nem várható megoldás?

Author — Miki Sragner

Author

HÓKUSZ PÓKUSZ BABILON LEOMLIK - A DOLGOK ÁLLÁSA 2020 - LIVESTREAM 20200605 21.00

Tóth Bertalan: Kásler alkalmatlan, és ezen az sem változtat, hogy most a rendőrökre bízzák az egészségügyet
Merkely Béla nekik lesz kötelező a koronavírus elleni védőoltás
„A rektor elmondta, van esély arra, hogy novemberre elkészül a védőoltás. A vakcina valószínűleg a 65 felettieknek, a betegségeik miatt rizikócsoportba sorolandóknak, a kórházi dolgozóknak és az idősotthonok személyzetének lesz kötelező”

Author — Ferenc Zsidó